On September 30, 2008, Leece, Elizabeth A.; Corletto, Federico; Brearley, Jacqueline C. published an article.Recommanded Product: 65896-14-2 The title of the article was A comparison of recovery times and characteristics with sevoflurane and isoflurane anaesthesia in horses undergoing magnetic resonance imaging. And the article contained the following:
To compare recovery times and quality following maintenance of anesthesia with sevoflurane or isoflurane after a standard i.v. induction technique in horses undergoing magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). Prospective, randomized, blinded clin. study. One hundred ASA I/II horses undergoing MRI. Pre-anesthetic medication with i.v. acepromazine and romifidine was followed by induction of anesthesia with diazepam and ketamine. The animals were randomized into two groups to receive either sevoflurane or isoflurane in oxygen. Horses were subjectively scored (0-5) for temperament before sedation, for quality of sedation, induction and maintenance and anesthetic depth on entering the recovery area. Recoveries were videotaped and scored by an observer, unaware of the treatment, using two scoring systems. Times to the first movement, head lift, sternal recumbency and standing were recorded along with the number of attempts to achieve sternal and standing positions. Variables were compared using a Student t-test or Mann-Whitney U-test (p < 0.05), while the correlation between subjective recovery score and other relevant variables was tested calculating the Spearman Rank correlation coefficient and linear regression modeling performed when significant. Seventy-seven horses entered the final anal., 38 received isoflurane and 39 sevoflurane. Body mass, age and duration of anesthesia were similar for both groups. There were no differences in recovery times, scoring or number of attempts to achieve sternal recumbency and standing between groups. Weak, but significant, correlations were found between the subjective recovery score for the pooled data from both groups and both temperament and time in sternal recumbency. No differences in recovery times or quality were detected following isoflurane or sevoflurane anesthesia after i.v. induction. Sevoflurane affords no obvious advantage in recovery over isoflurane following a standard i.v. induction technique in horses not undergoing surgery. The experimental process involved the reaction of N-(2-Bromo-6-fluorophenyl)-4,5-dihydro-1H-imidazol-2-amine hydrochloride(cas: 65896-14-2).Recommanded Product: 65896-14-2
The Article related to isoflo sevoflo anesthetic horse recovery time, Pharmacology: Effects Of Nervous System- and Behavior-Affecting Drugs and Neuromuscular Agents and other aspects.Recommanded Product: 65896-14-2
Referemce:
Imidazole – Wikipedia,
Imidazole | C3H4N2 – PubChem